Given today’s heightened enforcement climate, now is a good time to revisit the basics of the I-9 form and its origins.
The Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (IRCA) introduced a requirement for employers to verify the identity and work authorization of their employees. This law made it illegal for businesses to knowingly hire or continue employing unauthorized workers and introduced civil and criminal penalties for non-compliance. The goal was to ensure that employers played a role in maintaining a legal workforce, thereby discouraging unauthorized employment. To facilitate this, IRCA created the Form I-9, which employers must complete and retain for every employee.
In the years following IRCA, immigration enforcement continued to evolve. After the September 11, 2001, attacks, the U.S. government restructured its immigration agencies, shifting responsibilities to the newly formed Department of Homeland Security (DHS). While 9/11 did not directly change I-9 compliance requirements, it did lead to a broader focus on immigration enforcement and national security. This restructuring placed U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) in charge of administering Form I-9 requirements and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in charge of enforcing worksite compliance.
Today, ICE continues to increase its scrutiny of employer compliance. In fiscal year 2018, the number of worksite investigations quadrupled, and the agency has since dedicated additional resources to enforcement efforts. For employers, this means that following both the letter and spirit of the law is more important than ever to avoid costly penalties.
Form I-9 is a legally required document, not a mere administrative formality. It has been the subject of numerous compliance-related legal cases, and errors—whether intentional or not—can lead to civil penalties and even criminal liability. Employers who ignore compliance requirements have faced millions in fines, and in extreme cases, jail time.
The form itself is divided into four key sections, each with specific legal responsibilities:
Supplement A is used only if an employee receives assistance in completing Section One of Form I-9. If an employee can complete Section One on their own, this supplement is not needed.
In today’s enforcement landscape, I-9 compliance is more than just an HR formality—it’s a critical legal requirement. Even good-faith mistakes can result in significant penalties, and ICE audits are increasing in frequency. Employers looking to reduce risk and ensure full compliance should consider partnering with an I-9 compliance software provider. Automating the process not only enhances accuracy but also provides a valuable layer of protection against audits, fines, and potential legal consequences.
By understanding and following the I-9 process carefully, businesses can avoid costly errors and stay on the right side of the law.