Why ICE Fines Appear Arbitrary
The controlling legislation seeks to negate the chance that a business would knowingly employ undocumented workers but also to ensure that employers fear the risks of noncompliance enough to truly scrutinize verification documents. Even as courts permit ICE to limit good faith mistakes as a defense, the agency understands that genuine accidents do happen. The regulatory answer to reconciling these disparate values with American principles of fairness while also sharpening the law’s teeth is to bestow a certain amount of discretion through the Enhancement Matrix. Agents use the matrix to factor fewer tangible findings into the final result. This makes ICE fines somewhat arbitrary, but i9 Intelligence may be able to make that subjectivity work for you when you need it most.
ICE fines are based on two schedules that are established by federal law. The first considers how many unauthorized workers were knowingly employed and how many times the business has been caught violating immigration laws. The second focuses on the number of substantive violations and how many offenses the company has on record. Each number is expressed as a percentage of the company’s total workforce, and each percentage determines the amount of the fine. The totals generated by the two schedules are added together, and the sum forms the non-discretionary fine.
The subjectivity comes into play at the Enhancement Matrix stage. The matrix is used to either enhance or mitigate the fine by up to 25%, as determined by the agent’s personal assessment of these five factors.
Factor |
Aggravating |
Mitigating |
Neutral |
Business size |
+ 5% |
– 5% |
+/- 0% |
Good faith |
+ 5% |
– 5% |
+/- 0% |
Seriousness |
+ 5% |
– 5% |
+/- 0% |
Unauthorized aliens |
+ 5% |
– 5% |
+/- 0% |
History |
+ 5% |
– 5% |
+/- 0% |
Cumulative adjustment |
+ 25% |
– 25% |
+/- 0% |